Subscribe to download Archive

Vostok Oil is the new kid on Russia’s energy block

There are 19 oil and gas basins in the Arctic but only half of them have been explored. Experts believe they hold up to 90bn barrels of oil.
There are 19 oil and gas basins in the Arctic but only half of them have been explored. Experts believe they hold up to 90bn barrels of oil.

There is a new kid on Russia’s oil producing block: Vostok Oil is a joint venture (JV) set up to explore and exploit the oil resources of the Arctic, and the Kremlin has started to throw significant resources at the company as Russia’s existing oil fields reach peak production.

Russian oil and gas producers have to develop increasingly remote and challenging fields to keep their output stable as some of the biggest oil fields reach maturity or are already in decline.

A recent survey by the country’s licensing agency Rosnedra found that a third of Russia’s 2,700 large oil fields are unprofitable to develop and a separate study forecast Russia’s oil production will go into decline in the coming decades if new resources such as those in the Arctic are not opened up and developed.

The need to develop Russia’s Arctic oil is becoming pressing as Energy Minister Alexander Novak warned in September Russia is only three years away from peak oil production.

“We expect about 553mn tonnes of oil production in 2018. We will reach a peak of 570mn tonnes in 2021,” Novak said in September as cited by Interfax.

Almost half of current capacity could be lost in less than two decades as existing fields pass maturity, Novak said, with levels expected to drop to 310mn tonnes by 2035. Current reserves stood at 29.7bn tonnes of oil as of early 2017, he estimated. The decline in oil production would cost the budget some RUB3.3 trillion a year ($46.2bn) in taxes and another RUB1.3 trillion in foregone investment, or approximately 20% of its revenue, as well as hurting the already weak investment case.

That is where Vostok Oil comes in as the vehicle to bring what are believed to be massive Arctic oil resources online. Estimates of the reserves under the Arctic ice and snow are necessarily vague, but thought to be in the order of 90bn barrels of oil, or 12.3mn tonnes of oil, as well as 47 trillion cubic metres of gas in 19 geological basins. That means the Arctic could increase Russia’s reserves of known oil deposits by another half from the 29.7bn tonnes of oil it has now. Other estimates say that the Arctic deposits could double Russia’s oil reserves. No one is really sure as only half of the Arctic basins have been explored, but given the geology of the region experts are confident they contain very large deposits indeed.

Vostok Oil is a joint venture between state-owned oil major Rosneft and Russian owned private oil producer Neftegazholding (NGH), which is run by a former Rosneft executive, Eduard Khudainatov.

There are several major oil and gas projects already up and running within the Russian Arctic Circle, but the plan is to start adding to the inventory.

Vostok Oil’s principal asset will be the undeveloped Paiyakhskoye field, controlled by NGH and estimated to contain up to 8.8bn barrels of recoverable oil. It will also include the huge Vankor field group, which belongs to Rosneft. Vankor, where Rosneft is partnered with a group of Indian investors, has been in operation for a decade. Other Rosneft assets in the area may also be brought into the group, including those operated by its Yermak-Neftegaz JV with BP.

Tax breaks

The key to getting the Vostok Oil project off the ground is winning tax concessions from the state to help cover the massive infrastructure costs that comes with working in such an inhospitable environment.

Back in April, Rosneft’s powerful head Igor Sechin unveiled plans to President Vladimir Putin to establish a new Arctic production hub capable of producing 2mn barrels per day (bpd) of oil – equal to almost 9% of Russia’s total output last year. But Sechin warned this would only be possible with large tax breaks. Sechin called for RUB2.6 trillion in cuts to mineral extraction tax (MET), income tax and other levies.

Tax breaks are necessary, Rosneft claims, because of the high cost of developing infrastructure to ship oil from these fields to market, as the fields are far away from Russia’s existing pipeline infrastructure. This argument does not hold up for Vankor, which is already linked to Russia’s main pipeline system, and the finance ministry’s tax director, Alexei Sazanov, insisted on October 28 Vankor would not receive the same support as the other projects in Vostok Oil’s portfolio. Rosneft may fail to secure anywhere near as much relief as it had originally hoped for.

In the last month Sechin seems to have got some of what he wanted, but not everything. Initially Sechin was asking for a 30-year tax holiday, including zero MET for the new projects and a lower MET at Vankor, as well as zero property and land taxes, 7% income tax (the standard rate is 20%) and a 7.6% insurance contribution (versus the standard 30%).

The government has agreed in principle to a benefits package for Rosneft’s Arctic investments, Vedomosti reported on October 24. The government is offering to switch the projects to a new excess profit tax (EPT) regime, provide them with zero MET for only 12 years (or until 1% of reserves have been developed) and a 1% MET rate from their 12th to 17th year of operation, with a gradual increase to the standard rate.

“As far as onshore oilfields are concerned, the Arctic tax breaks that have so far been agreed are somewhat more modest than what Rosneft originally requested for the yet-to-be-formed Vostok Oil JV in July,” Sberbank CIB said in a research note on October 25. This said, a final decision has not been made and Sechin has a record of getting what he wants.

Rosneft also argues that the tax breaks are needed to attract foreign investors that can bring expertise and financing to the project. It reportedly plans to sell a 15-20% stake in Vostok Oil to a group of Indian investors that are reportedly waiting in the wings.

The government is caught on the horns of a dilemma as it is just getting into RUB25.7 trillion investments into the 12 national projects investment programme that is a badly needed attempt to remake Russia’s economic model.

The Russian budget still relies heavily on the MET for its income and the national projects call for some RUB2 trillion a year of extra spending on top of the crica RUB16 trillion the government already spends – in other words exactly the value of the tax breaks that Sechin is asking for.

The tax relief Vostsok Oil is demanding to make these projects feasible will put more strain on the budget, that is running a 3% surplus at the moment and will do for several years, but that is before the national project spending really gets underway.

Making it happen

Despite the budgetary juggling that will be needed, the Vostok Oil project is already a reality and will almost certainly go ahead.

While Rosneft may be leveraging its influence to try to get more tax relief than is necessary, government officials agree that state support is vital for Arctic oil and gas projects to be successful under current market conditions and the project is vital if Russia’s oil production is not to go into decline in the coming decades.

Global warming has made the Arctic project increasingly viable as it has opened up the so-called northern route that allows nuclear icebreakers to travel along Russia’s far northern coast between Europe and Asia, cutting weeks off the trip and significantly lowering transport costs. But at the same time lower oil prices have cut the amount the project can earn and reduced its economic viability.

Those projects that have made progress in the downturn have done so largely thanks to government backing. The $27bn Yamal LNG gas liquefaction project on Russia’s northwest coast, launched by private gas producer Novatek in late 2017, for example, will not pay any export tax, MET or property tax, and is subject to a reduced profit tax, during its first 12 years of operation. Similar concessions are anticipated to be granted to Novatek’s upcoming Arctic LNG-2 project, which is now making rapid progress.

Gazprom is also hoping for tax breaks to develop its own LNG project on the western side of the country, and struck a deal with Germany’s Linde in October on setting up a joint venture to design facilities for the processing and liquefaction of natural gas.

But attempts to develop Russia’s Arctic oil and gas fields are have been stymied by a series of external shocks so far, including the 2014 oil price crash. The development of offshore fields in the region came to a complete standstill that year, not only becasue of low oil prices but also the introduction of US and EU sanctions preventing Western companies from taking part in projects. US oil major ExxonMobil promptly withdrew from its JV with Rosneft at the Pobeda oil discovery in the Kara Sea, where the pair found an estimate 9bn barrels of crude.

So far the only offshore Arctic project to get off the ground is run by state-owned Gazprom Neft at the Prirazlomnoye field in the region, and no new offshore fields are expected to go into production until after 2030.

Fossil fuels still account for around 54% of Russia's export revenues. The concern is that as the industry becomes ever more reliant on the Arctic and other remote areas for growth, the government will increasingly struggle to afford the tax relief needed to spur development. Moscow may have to look for cash in other areas, potentially adding to the tax burden of its citizens, or bring in large international oil companies as partners, which means making more concessions to the West to ease the sanctions regime.